Reader MM writes:
There's a rumor going around GoComics.com that Girl was dispqualified by dint of the fact that some of the strips were reworked Ozy and Millie 'toons.
If there is such a rumor, there's no truth to it.
« Status report | Main | Because a personal web site should include a portfolio »
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
The comments to this entry are closed.
Like I've said before, Girl ≠ Ozy and Millie, for the simple reason that Girl (wait, it's Zoey now, isn't it?) doesn't cause chaos, she just happens to get into it (and I'm not too sure I can call what I saw in the contest "chaos").
Posted by: Frank | 11/16/2010 at 07:24 PM
Every story remind something to someone, of course... We rarely invent. Most of time we readapt, draw things we've seen or just things that are actual. It once happened to me to draw almost exactly the same cartoon than another toonist at a con. Never seen him before, just that the topic was actual.
Nevermind such rumors.
Posted by: Belgarath | 11/14/2010 at 11:43 AM
It's quite a silly rumor when you consider the number of comics that have strips that are reworked versions of earlier work by their cartoonist, Eg; Lots of early Doonsbury's are reworked versions of G.B. Trudeau's collage strip, lots of early Bloom County's are reworked Academia Waltz's and lot of Pearls before Swine's are reworked versions of a web comic by the same name.
Posted by: Fizzle | 11/13/2010 at 06:38 PM